CAGW, The New One-eyed Religion

It used to be that if you grew your hair long, smoked joints and became a tree-hugging vegetarian you were then criticised, ridiculed and ostracised by the general public for being a threat to society.

The general consensus THEN was that anyone who questioned the accepted norm and exercised their individual choice was inconsiderate, immoral, and irresponsibly antisocial, putting the lives of others in jeopardy by acting so selfishly. These days it's something else.

The same shit gets dumped on you if you hold an opinion that goes against the norm. Just because nearly everyone agrees on something doesn't mean they're right, even if they are 'expert' scientists.

Well, I'll be a monkey's uncle before I ever accept the ridiculous Darwinian theory of evolution. Or let any one-eyed religious fanatic rant on about how their God is The One True God and all other Gods are false. Or listen to a dietician lecture me about how vegetarians don't get enough protein or how butter is bad for you.


Most diseases were almost eradicated BEFORE the vaxx. 

So let me get this straight. I think every parent should be free not to vaccinate their child without being penalised by having their social rights, liberties and opportunities taken away from them. To all those rabid provaxxers who viciously attack such parents, why are you so afraid if your holy vaccine is so goddam  effective? Shouldn't you instead be calm and quietly comfortable that your precious child is protected?


Weather changes constantly - so does climate. 

Let me get another thing straight. I am not a climate change denier. I like the variety of life experience that changing weather surprises us with. Personally I don't really think it matters at all whether the globe is warming or cooling. After all, it has been doing that for millions of years without completely wiping out Life On Earth. I'll leave all of that to the wisdom of Mother Nature.

I just don't blindly buy the "catastrophic" Al Gore bit (have you seen his power bills?), the same way I don't believe it is purely man-made (anthropogenic). CAGW, or Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming is the term "truthers" use to describe "alarmist"  agenda about climate change. "Denier" or "Climate Change skeptic" are derogatory terms used to disrespect anyone who dares to challenge the sacrosanct "science" of CAGW.

For cripes ache, no-one can even predict tomorrow's weather properly. Storms can spontaneously arise out of nowhere as much as they can suddenly vanish. Experts. Yeah. In the 70's these experts were whispering about a possible Ice Age coming.....

And another thing. Or two.

New World Order conspiracy? It's called capitalism (typed lower case as as my own personal protest!). Yep, that's how the world has been run for centuries. Don't like it? Go and live on a commune and be self-sufficient. Oh and before you leave, hand in all your tech.

World War 3? Maybe. The second coming of the Messiah (nothing to do with Donald Trump). Mass destruction of the planet by nuclear warfare (well, maybe Trump there!). Back to the commune again, this time with the obligatory Bomb Shelter.

Workplace environment making you sick? Autoimmune diseases on the rise? Peanuts, anaphylaxis anyone? Autism, MRSA, Ziva virus, Ebola? Get out of the city, spend time at a Wellness Retreat, harmonise with nature. Go hug a tree...

Medical Marijuana is useless as a recreational drug! 

Medical Marijuana? Cannabidiol (CBD) and other non-psychotropic cannabinoids that don't get you high have many times the therapeutic uses that THC lacks (TetraHydraCannabinol is what gets stoners high). Botanically and psychoactively antagonistic, CBD only occurs in hybridised strains low in THC (the two can't &coexist& in the same plant). Plants are either high in CBD or THC, never both.

Both THC and CBD reduce pain and nausea and increase appetite. THC only covers this small amount of the therapeutic spectrum. CBD on the other hand reduces anxiety, inflammation, psychosis (it is an antidote to schizophrenia triggered by by marijuana use), seizures, muscle spasms, blood sugar and fights bacteria, cancer cells, tumours, and promotes bone growth. There are many other non-psychotropic cannabinoids with medical properties to aid sleep, suppress appetite, treat fungal infections and who knows what else. But not THC.

The best Medical Marijuana doesn't get anyone high and should therefore be legal. Stoners who try to legalise dope cannot use this argument because all the non-psychotropic forms of cannabis cover everything that dope has, plus much more dope hasn't.

Think about it for a minute... 

Petrol crisis? Remember we all bought 4-cylinder cars, sucked in! Alien invasion? Still waiting. Flat Earth? Hollow Earth? Everything orbits the Earth? (it took a while, but eventually the Church admitted they were wrong)....

Embrace Climate Change. Pay Carbon Tax. Buy more expensive Green electricity. Go Paleo. Eat meat. Legalise marijuana. Vaccinate your child. Take modern medicines without questioning your doctor. They know best. Just don't remind them about what's happened because of over-prescribed antibiotics. Or Thalidomide, Vioxx, anticholinergics, statins, etc etc etc. The list goes on and on, how you should conform - and don't even think about it! 

Gayyag mirrorage

Farceboof doesn't hide 3/4 of a worded post, so here it is in photo format so you have no excuse for not reading it. (#Qanda topic: Gay Mirage Plebiscite)

I was surfing telly late last night and found ABC1's Q&A was milking the "gay marriage" plebiscite theme. Everyone knows that THAT program is STACKED for a preset biased outcome. Anyone who opposes "CONSENSUS" (consensus being a 'loaded word', meaning not only the majority of agreed opinion but also what the Government want you to believe) with contrary views is only on this show to be used as a punching bag. They are neither given balanced representation on the panel, nor the numbers in the audience to cheer them on, only a consensus majority to boo them down.

This show isn't a debate, it's a show of hands. A show masquerading as a debate. An organised propaganda campaign. If you watch this show expecting to see a fair exchange of ideas you are going to be seriously disappointed. I used quotation marks for "gay marriage" to represent gayyag mirrorage because it is an oxymoron.

Please understand that I support full legal status for whatever gender Civil Unions, Betrothals, Weddings, etc. and that I speak English and know what the word marriage means. There can never be such a thing as "gay marriage" because it is an oxymoron, like an "honest liar" or a "cruel pacifist". The etymology of marriage indicates two people of either gender. If you study the linguistic roots of the word 'marriage' this will become quite clear. To get it to refer to a bi-gender union - and, for that matter, union between two hermaphrodites or even transvestites - you have to twist its meaning somewhat - for instance, like 'phobia' now means disapproval instead of fear, as in 'homophobia'. But I can honestly say that some butch lesbians and some limp fops scare the shit out of me.

As soon as I saw that lava flow aka Magma Shebangszki and learnt she was going to speak about gayyag mirrorage I felt sick and couldn't find the channel button fast enough. Let me make this quite clear - I have no idea why she was ever in comedy. She is one of the unfunniest people ever on television and I certainly don't consider her a comedienne or, to be absurdly politically correct, a comedian. I don't hate homosexuals, and "some of my best friends are gay", but do I want to hear her views on why anyone, male or female, should be allowed to 'marry' her? What a travesty of justice that life sentence would be! (that's a joke, peoples...) 

Bigot, n. One who holds irrespective of reason, & attaches disproportionate weight to, some creed or point of view [16th cent. from French; origin unknown] Oxford English Dictionary.  

And let's clear one thing up: being opposed to same-sex "marriage" does not make you a bigot. It means that you  hold an opinion that some people don't like. They don't question their right to not like your opinion yet they think you don't have a right to be contrary. NOW, spot the bigot! 

Folklore Pre-dates History

Attempts (lies) by Europeans to Compile (fabricate) the History of the World vs Folklore of Ancient Civilisations; which is closer to the Truth?

Have you ever wondered why folklore and 'scientific' history are so at loggerheads? Why it is that traditional knowledge passed on by Elders and held as sacred is written off as 'mythology' and disregarded as inherently 'unscientific'? Because it challenges the Modern Christian View – that until the "Advent of Our Lord Jesus Christ", all humans were 'hopelessly drifting in an ignorant world of chaos devoid of sophistication and spiritual meaning'. Nothing could be further from the truth! People were much more tuned-in prior to 5,000 years ago, or at least 'in harmony with nature'.

To get a perspective of the difference between accounts we must compare the folklore handed down through generations with modern observations by outsiders who are completely removed from any first-hand experience – a prerequisite known as 'independent objective analysis', deemed as compulsory by Western 'experts' in any valid assessment.

Several cultures have histories that go so far back that their origins cannot be traced or determined, making them for want of a better word 'pre-historic'. India and China and to some extent Egypt and Meso-America have no known beginning, at least according to outside observers. Yet these and many other Ancient Civilisations, cultures and tribes have their own version of history at odds with the so-called 'experts'. Some do not put an exact figure to it, in that the origins are so lost in time that it is pointless to even try to callibrate dates. Others are more precise, using age-old complex calenders to record the passing of Time.

White Christian Europeans proselytise a version of history that fits in neatly with the Biblical account of The Flood ie 4,000 years ago, even to the point where non-Creationist Evolution theories are almost secretly tolerated because they aid in denying the concept of intelligent, civilised peoples inhabiting the Earth long before and independently of the Coming of Jesus - merely as a bunch of primitive, ape-like subhumans grunting and behaving like animals, incapable of higher thought.

Actually, these lost-in-time modern nations still survive today by virtue of their innate moral refinement, developed social structure, and highly advanced survival skills - the most important technical advancement necessary to thrive. Technology has up until now been unimportant, simply because it wasn't needed for survival, and actually made life unnecessarily complicated, being largely at the expense of Mother Nature.

Many 'facts' are misunderstood by modern historians. Take writing, for example. Older cultures are painted as being undeveloped, dumb cavemen hardly capable of anything requiring such expertise as language let alone calligraphy. Yet these Ancient Civilisations all attest to not needing to write anything down, as their highly developed memory removed any need of such tiresome practices as recording in writing pictograms, hieroglyphics, calligraphy, etc. Only due to the deterioration of memory (a symptom of Kali-Yuga as the Hindus call it, beginning c. 3012 BC) did writing etc simultaneously emerge all over the globe in many remote cultures independently around the same time, ie the last couple of thousand years. Strange thing, that. Progress - my foot!  

It is not unreasonable from this perspective to say that the Human Race is actually devolving, systematically jeopardising our own survival by bit by bit destroying the very substance of our existance - Planet Earth - all in the name of 'Progress'! Up until the Industrial Revolution of the Middle Ages, every corner of the globe was relatively safe from wanton 'development'. With colonisation by White Christian Europeans of each and every yet unexploited nook and cranny of the Third World, came genocide of the indigenous population, rape of the countyside and mass extinction of multitudes of species, irreversibly altering the face of the Earth forever.

Progress it certainly ain't. The intellectual elite responsible is preoccupied with sensual pleasures, all at the cost of natural instinct. In fact these 'refined' barbarians are so twisted that they try to pretend that it is the only way 'forward' when we smarter folk know that getting back to our roots is the only key for a meaningful existence and successful survival. Far from being a regression, it is a necessity in terms of Quality Of Life.

Take for example, 2012 of the Mayan Calendar. Anyone in the know was aware that this date represents the beginning of a new calendar cycle upon the completion of the outgoing measurement cycle. Yet this was widely publicised by Western propagandists, in an attempt to discredit the Ancient Civilisations, falsely as a 'Doomsday Event', thereby inviting mockery in its inevitable failure to materialise due to it being a complete falsification.

Or, take the Boden Chair, Oxford University, 1832. It was created to 'translate' (with alteration; to weaken and discredit) the Vedas into English with the sole purpose of converting Hindus into Christians. To this day Monier Monier-Williams is regarded by Western Scholars as the most influential in the formation of the Sanskrit-to-English dictionary. Yet its inception was maligned right from the very beginning. Who knows how much has been meddled with, deliberately lost - even the 'original' Devanagari script may have been tampered with! There is one classic questionable incidence in the Garuda Purana where it supposedly 'says', "Two things improve with beating - a drum, and a woman". I kid you not. This is decidedly 'un-Vedic', totally against the tone of the vast body of work, the Veda.

There is much controversy as to the dating of the Vedas, conveniently  contrived by Western scholars to be post-Flood, contrary to indications and references contained within the texts. There are astronomical constellations and transits, configurations, etc mentioned throughout, that over and over again place the dates many thousands of years earlier than The Flood. Yet these twisted Christians won't allow it. Ask the indigenous Hindus, and they will all tell you that The Veda are anywhere from 4-6,000 BC to 10,000 even 20,000 BC, not 1500 BC!

As for the Chinese - well, good luck with that, especially considering their record for censoring sensitive information from public scrutiny. Even if they had a solid handle on their history, it's unlikely they would make it available for scholarly disection. All those dynasties, Ming, Tang, whatever, dates are a bit muddled, but we get the general picture - prebiblical, same as the Indian dynasties well recorded in detail as far as names of families go, just not so hot on the dates due to conflicting use of different calendars.

End of Part 1.

Part 2: Giants, Ogres, Fairies and other Little Folk 
(to be continued...)